What are the issues of integrity, ethics and law posed in the case study?
What options does the company have, and what should it do and why?
In the agreement, the woman is required to confirm that the executive did nothing wrong, and after the agreement is signed the woman is prohibited from discussing anything about the incident publicly.
Before the date scheduled to sign the settlement agreement, the woman's lawyer mentions that she has heard the executive has done this before, and the settlement amount is very large because the company probably had a legal obligation to dismiss the executive previously.
There is no need to provide excessive amounts of time for group discussion, as ideas can be developed further with the class as a whole.
Lecturers can vary the group they call upon to encourage responsive participation.For lecturers teaching large classes, case studies with multiple parts and different methods of solution lend themselves well to the group size and energy in such an environment.Lecturers can begin by having students vote on which case study they prefer.Over the years, the company has developed a reputation in the town for taking care of its employees and being a responsible corporate citizen.The manufacturing process used by the company produces a by-product that for years has flown into the town river.Her parents and immediate family had already passed away, so she discussed her wishes with her mother-in-law, who said she would comply with her daughter-in-law's wishes.In her will, the woman gave control of her estate to the mother-in-law.The by-product has been considered harmless but some people who live near the river have reported illnesses.The by-product does not currently violate any anti-pollution laws.Some of the issues raised by this case study include the factors and decisions that led to the current situation, such as worker loyalty caused by scarce employment and the power the company holds over the town; whether the company is acting consistently with its reputation as a good corporate citizen and whether not doing so affects its integrity; the ethics of companies compared to persons, and whether companies should have more or fewer obligations and why; whether and why the company should take action even though the by-product does not violate any laws, and if it should take action, whether the company should establish criteria for helping it decide when to address complaints that do not raise illegal actions.Is there a problem with the current state of the law, and if there is, can the company use that to justify non-action?