This theory is a set of ideas on how people behave and how institutions operate.
The analysis of this short story and the of the work of Emile Durkheim shows the relationship of the two in the field of Sociology.
This quite evident in the way such evils presented in this short story are happening in just friendly atmosphere, reflecting the camouflaging nature of humans.
Despite the short story being not insidious until near its end, the author seems to be foreshadowing this notion of deadliness as brought out through M. Summers in this short story makes him seem a respected man as he coordinates various social activities. Summers, yet a very dangerous one is reported by Shirley (282) that, “Mr. with one hand resting carelessly on the black box, he seemed very proper and important as he talked interminably to Mr. Such activities may seem normal with regard to the village norms, but they reflect high degree of human rights violation.
First, the lottery rules of participation reflect a rigid social hierarchy based upon an inequitable social division of labor.
Also, the villagers believe unconsciously that their commitment to a work ethic will grant them some magical immunity from the selection of the black box.
Though this story is not dominated by many actions, characterization is well defined by the few actions the characters are involved. Delacroix is brought out in the story as being highly determined and quick tempered lady.
This is reflected by her action of selecting a large stone ‘so large that she had to pick it with two hands in anger of ….” (Shirley 76).
Together with hypocrisy, ‘lottery’ in this short story presents the weak nature of human nature.
Considering that this act of lottery had been a routine in this village for many years, no one seems to question its negative impacts in the general human welfare.